• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Connecting Researchers and Research

Sign in/Register
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Privacy Policy
  • About
        • Our Mission
          • 2025 Vision
          • ORCID Trust
          • Annual Reports
        • Team
          • ORCID Board
          • ORCID Team
          • Work with Us!
        • Services
          • Member Portal
          • Annual data files
          • Member API
          • Public API
          • ORCID Registry
        • Governance
          • Bylaws
          • Board Elections
        • Policies
          • Privacy Policy
          • Dispute Procedures
          • Public Client Terms of Service
          • Open Source Project License
          • Public Data File Use Policy
          • Terms of Use
          • Brand Guidelines
  • For Researchers
        • Benefits for Researchers
        • Researcher FAQ
        • Video Tutorials
        • Your ORCID Record
        • Get Help
  • Membership
        • Membership Benefits
          • Benefits for Funders
          • Benefits for Publishers
          • Benefits for Research Organizations
          • Benefits for Research Resources
        • Get Membership
        • Member List
        • ORCID Map
        • Membership Comparison
          • Basic Membership
          • Premium Membership
          • ORCID Consortia
        • ORCID Consortia
          • Consortia Agreement
          • Consortia Onboarding Checklist
          • Roles and Responsibilities of ORCID Consortia
  • Documentation
        • Features
          • Member Portal
          • Member API
          • Public API
          • ORCID Registry
          • Annual Data Files
        • Workflows
          • Journal Articles
          • Employment
          • Peer Review
          • Funder and Grants
          • View More
        • Integration Guide
          • Getting Started with Your Integration
          • Sandbox Testing Server
          • Registering a Member API Client
          • Integration and API FAQ
          • View More
        • API Tutorials
          • Get an Authenticated ORCID iD
          • Read Data on a Record
          • Add and Update Data on an ORCID record
          • Hands On with the ORCID API
          • View More
        • Member Portal
          • Member Portal Organization Admin Guide
          • Member Portal Email Guide
          • Member Portal Beta Program Guide
  • Resources
        • ORCID Community
        • Community Programs
          • Certified Service Providers
          • ORCID API Users Group
          • Historical Task Forces, Working Groups, and Steering Groups
        • Get Involved
          • Community Groups
          • Developers
          • Give Feedback
          • ORCID API Users Group
        • Member Resources
          • ORCID Enabled Systems
          • Publishers Open Letter
          • Funders Open Letter
          • Standard Member Agreement
          • Outreach Resources
          • Register a Sandbox API Client
          • Register a Production API Client
  • News & Events
        • News
          • ORCID News
          • Member News
          • Consortia News
          • Integration News
          • Blog
          • Product Updates
        • Events
          • Events Calendar
          • Webinars

The More we Need to Change: Moving toward Contributorship

May 7, 2014 By Laure Haak

ORCID just received the Award for Meritorious Achievement from the Council of Science Editors, in recognition for its pioneering work creating an open digital author identification system and helping to advance CSE’s mission to improve scientific communication. 

We are truly honored! 

ORCID has from the start been a community effort.  Adoption early on by researchers, editors, publishers, and associations has been critical in broader adoption and use by researchers, universities and funders.

We sincerely thank you for your support.

As I was flying home from the CSE meeting,  I had the opportunity to reflect on how we can help each other transform the way research and scholarly works are created and shared.  David Haber mentioned in his comments at the meeting, that we need to start thinking about publications as data, rather than a collection of words.  It is now about 50 years since Doug Engelbart’s demonstration of the power and potential of interactive linked data, and we are still struggling with how to make his vision a reality in publishing.  With publications as data, integration of machine-readable identifiers into processes and systems becomes natural.  Identifiers can allow us to connect people, places, and things within and between systems—and then to present these connected data in interactive interfaces.

But, as Siva Vaidhyanathan admonished us during his keynote address, more data is not necessarily better. Big data without the intention to understand causality does not enlighten, it just takes up big space.

One really fabulous example of what can be done with big data and intentionality is ChemSpider. Here is a database of chemicals linked to identifiers, chemical structures, names, uses. Wow.  Antony Williams provided a demonstration at the Allen Press Emerging Trends in Scholarly Publishing meeting last week, and I am still bowled over.  There are nascent initiatives by Force11 to establish identifiers and rich linkages for resources and reagents, by Science Exchange to establish standardized experimental methods, by geoscientists to establish identifiers for geosamples, by CrossRef to establish standards for acknowledge funding, and efforts to support citation of datasets by Force 11, DataCite and ORCID, and figshare, to name a few.  These initiatives are driven by the need to support transparency and reproducibility in experimental research.  I would argue they are also critical for engendering public trust in the scientific process itself.

Moving from text to data allows the opportunity to componentize the publication (should I still be calling it that?) and make it possible to clearly articulate and credit authors for their specific contributions, such as images, datasets, plots, methods. Liz Allen and her colleagues have prototyped a tool for standardizing the description and collection of contributor roles.  This has been taken up by NISO and CASRAI for development into a formal standard, and one can now imagine more precision in acknowledging credit, less focus on author order, and perhaps even a change from authorship model to one based on contributorship. 

This makes me dream about a more seamless connection between researchers, contributors, and authors.  The possibility for acknowledging and encouraging a broader range of contributions than papers.  Of a continued conversation, through annotations, re-analysis, and post-publication peer review.  Of shared access.

Is research a “cycle of repeated failure”, as Siva Vaidhyanathan said in his keynote address, only because we cannot publish negative results?  Will research be a less agonizing occupation if we have a more certain understanding of how an experiment was conducted, with what resources and methods? If we can share more easily the bits that do work?  Will we share more readily because we can get credit for these contributions outside (or inside) of a paper?  Wouldn’t it be so very cool to be able to utilize the power of the Web to support 3-dimensional articles: integration of narrative with datasets, methods and tools, people, interactive re-analyzable charts, samples, funding, organizations, other works, annotations, and post-publication peer review?

And I then come crashing back down to earth (it is notable that the pilot is announcing our approach to the airport).  How are we going to move toward this positive vision of sharing and attribution if we still cannot move metadata from a submission system into a publication?  If co-authorship is not explicitly affirmed during the publication process?  If we continue to think that duct-taping the text-based process is enough?

ORCID has come a long way since our launch eighteen months ago.  The CSE award is an indicator of community awareness of the potential for persistent identifiers. But as a community, we have a long way to go to realize the potential of identifiers, and more broadly the potential of a data-based contributorship model of research. Together, we can do more, and as a community we must.

 

 

 

Blog

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

Search

Blog Posts by Category

  • Consortia News (39)
  • Integration News (50)
  • Member News (30)
  • News (435)
  • ORCID News (196)
  • Product Updates (75)

Recent Posts

  • Restructuring Engagement to Optimize Member Support
  • OpenAIRE EXPLORE Makes it Simple to Add Works to Your ORCID Record
  • 2021 Product: Our Progress to Date and Future Plans
  • Use Your ORCID Record to Build Your Career: An Interview with Dr. Adriana Romero-Olivares
  • ORCID and Morressier

Sign up for blog updates

We will only use your email to notify you when we have new blog posts. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

ORCID logo

CC0 The text of this website is published under a CC0 license Images and marks are subject to copyright and trademark protection.

  • About ORCID
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Contact us
  • Dispute procedures
  • Brand Guidelines