• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Connecting Researchers and Research

Sign in/Register
  • About
        • Our Mission
          • 2025 Vision
          • ORCID Trust
          • Annual Reports
        • Team
          • ORCID Board
          • ORCID Team
          • Work with Us!
        • Services
          • Member Portal
          • Annual data files
          • Member API
          • Public API
          • ORCID Registry
        • Governance
          • Bylaws
          • Board Elections
        • Policies
          • Privacy Policy
          • Dispute Procedures
          • Public Client Terms of Service
          • Open Source Project License
          • Public Data File Use Policy
          • Terms of Use
          • Brand Guidelines
  • For Researchers
        • Benefits for Researchers
        • Researcher FAQ
        • Video Tutorials
        • Sign in / Register
        • Get Help
  • Membership
        • Membership Benefits
          • Benefits for Funders
          • Benefits for Publishers
          • Benefits for Research Organizations
          • Benefits for Research Resources
        • Get Membership
        • Member List
        • ORCID Map
        • Membership Comparison
          • Basic Membership
          • Premium Membership
          • ORCID Consortia
        • ORCID Consortia
          • Consortia Agreement
          • Consortia Onboarding Checklist
          • Roles and Responsibilities of ORCID Consortia
  • Documentation
        • Features
          • Member Portal
          • Member API
          • Public API
          • ORCID Registry
          • Annual Data Files
        • Workflows
          • Journal Articles
          • Employment
          • Peer Review
          • Funder and Grants
          • View More
        • Integration Guide
          • Getting Started with Your Integration
          • Sandbox Testing Server
          • Registering a Member API Client
          • Integration and API FAQ
          • View More
        • API Tutorials
          • Get an Authenticated ORCID iD
          • Read Data on a Record
          • Add and Update Data on an ORCID record
          • Hands On with the ORCID API
          • View More
  • Resources
        • ORCID Community
        • Community Programs
          • Certified Service Providers
          • ORCID API Users Group
          • Historical Task Forces, Working Groups, and Steering Groups
        • Get Involved
          • Community Groups
          • Developers
          • Give Feedback
          • ORCID API Users Group
        • Member Resources
          • ORCID Enabled Systems
          • Publishers Open Letter
          • Funders Open Letter
          • Standard Member Agreement
          • Outreach Resources
          • Register a Sandbox API Client
          • Register a Production API Client
  • News & Events
        • News
          • ORCID News
          • Member News
          • Consortia News
          • Integration News
          • Blog
          • Release Notes
        • Events
          • Events Calendar
          • Webinars

Science of Science Policy: The need for data standards and persistent identifiers

September 30, 2013 By Laure Haak

At ORCID, we have been largely focused on researchers who perform research and use the Registry to obtain an iD and link to their works.  In fact, there is another group of researchers who will benefit: those who are interested in mining the linkages in ORCID data to derive and test models of knowledge flow and innovation. 

A recent workshop on the Empirical Foundations of Science and Innovation Policy, organized by Julia Lane of the American Institute of Research, Jacques Mairesse of ENSAE, and Paula Stephan of Georgia Tech, brought together researchers and funding agency representatives from several countries, whose work has been inspired by both the U.S. STAR METRICS program and the National Science Foundation’s Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program, to start building an international community of practice for the science of science policy. During the proceedings, it became clear that persistent identifiers and data exchange standards are an important resource to support research in this emerging field. 

Present at the meeting were economists, research administrators, and program administrators from funding organizations and research universities and centers, including the European Research Council, the National Science Foundation, the Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST), Agence National de Recherche, KAIST, the Univeristy of Strasbourg, Max Planck, Ministere de Enseignement Superieure et Recherche, Imperial College London, Melbourne University, California Institute of Technology, University Boccini, KU Leuven, Charles University, Institute of the Czech Langauge, Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education (CERGE-EI), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Institut für Samfunnsforskning, and Ohio State University. 

Presentations focused on developing systematic approaches to measure scientific and economic results of research.  Participants discussed feasibility studies to gather data to support their research, and the subsequent research studies.  Among the questions under study are the effectiveness of “star researcher” programs, methods to link grant funding with research results, impact of funding on training and subsequent careers of graduate students, the impact of scientific team formation on research outputs, and the flow of people and ideas through organizations and firms.  Abstracts and a participant list are available on the meeting website. 

A common thread across presentations was the immense work required to obtain and clean research administration data—information on funding, faculty, trainees, research outputs, and spin-offs. Confidentiality was an important consideration that the community needs to address. Participants noted that previous work had been essentially one-off studies:  barriers to access, updating, and annotation made each effort sui generis. It was not possible to generalize findings, particularly those studies for which data on researchers, funding, and outputs were derived from a single institution. In addition, tracking the mobility of scientists across organizations and disciplines requires the integration of data from different countries to be able to support cross-institutional or international models. The STAR METRICS and U METRICS programs, and the related international activities, have been largely focused on building a data infrastructure that permits the development of such linkages and creates the possibility for a common data platform to promote generalizable and replicable research.

Attendees agreed that the activities would be greatly helped by initiatives such as CASRAI, the EuroCRIS CERIF data model , and ORCID: they offer considerable potential to reduce the substantial data cleaning, linking, and standardization challenges if widely adopted. CASRAI provides a common dictionary for research administration data and exchangeable business objects, CERIF a common information metadata model for storage and exchange, and ORCID a persistent researcher identifier.  Together with persistent identifiers for organizations and research works, these non-profit community-driven organizations can provide a thin-layer infrastructure to link data between databases through standard data exchange processes, a necessity for the study of the science of science policy. In many cases, all that is required to support interoperation is addition of identifier fields to existing databases and API mapping work, and much can be accomplished to address this disconnect in a sustainable way through cooperative efforts to tie together these various parts of the problem.

ORCID and similar community-driven infrastructure organizations can learn from the Science of Science Policy community about the needs of its researchers to ensure that the developing infrastructure is appropriately responsive. One example is how ORCID is leveraging CASRAI definitions and CERIF metadata. Another is our collaboration with DataCite on the ODIN project to support data citation (see our recent blog on the DataCite and RDA meetings). In turn, Science of Science Policy researchers can benefit from improvements in the long-term quality of data for analysis, and more broadly the research community will benefit from an evidence-based understanding of innovation. 

 

 

Blog

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for blog updates

We will only use your email to notify you when we have new blog posts. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Recent Posts

  • 2020: A Look Back As We Venture Forward
  • New Integration – GIST
  • New Integration – University of Victoria
  • New Integration – Vidatum Technologies
  • New Integration – Mendel University in Brno

Blog Posts by Category

  • Consortia News (39)
  • Integration News (48)
  • Member News (30)
  • News (429)
  • ORCID News (192)
  • Release Notes (74)
ORCID logo

CC0 The text of this website is published under a CC0 license Images and marks are subject to copyright and trademark protection.

  • About ORCID
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Contact us
  • Dispute procedures
  • Brand Guidelines
ORCID uses cookies to improve your experience and to help us understand how you use our websites. Learn more about how we use cookies. Dismiss